FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT TRANSPARENCY POLICY

What are transparency policies?

Transparency policies are government requirements that corporations or other organizations disclose factual information for the purpose of reducing public risks that those organizations create or flaws in their performance. Auto safety ratings, nutritional labels, toxic pollution reporting, and corporate financial disclosure aim to reduce public risks, for example. School report cards, campaign finance disclosure, and bank mortgage-lending reporting aim to improve the fairness or quality of key institutions.   

What do transparency policies have in common?

Whatever their purpose, transparency policies have 5 characteristics:

  • Required public disclosure

  • by corporations or other organizations

  • of standardized factual information

  • about specific products or practices

  • to further a public purpose.

How do transparency policies work?

Transparency policies work by providing missing information that people need. The idea is that new information improves the choices of customers, employees, investors, and citizens. Those changed choices, in turn, encourage disclosing organizations to reduce risks or improve services. For example, nutritional labels on packaged foods aim to reduce risks of heart disease and cancer. They work if shoppers use them to make healthier choices and if food companies, in turn, improve their products.

What kinds of public problems can transparency policies address?

Transparency policies are best suited to problems where:

  • an information gap creates needless risks or service failures

  • the policy problem lends itself to consensus metrics

  • new information can be provided in understandable form

  • people have real choices

  • disclosing organizations can improve products or practices

  • and it’s ok if some people end up better off and others don’t

Why is government action needed?

Many private transparency systems thrive—ratings of motion pictures, colleges, and restaurants, for example. Often, however, private systems do not provide enough information to help ordinary citizens make wise choices. When public risks are serious, government often steps in because only government can require disclosure, assure that it will last, and link it to democratic processes. 

Can transparency policies actually reduce risks and improve public services?

Auto rollover ratings, restaurant grading, nutritional labeling, bank reporting on fair lending, and corporate financial reporting are examples of policies that reduce risks or improve services. However, transparency often fails because of politics, poor planning, or flawed execution—or because it is not a suitable approach to the problem at hand. Out-of-date, inaccurate, or useless information is often worse than no information at all.

Can international policies work?

Transparency policies provide a promising approach to some problems that cross political boundaries, even when there are no treaties or formal multinational agreements. International corporate financial reporting and international infectious disease reporting, for example, show promise in reducing risks to investors and reducing the spread of epidemics.  

How does the Internet change the potential of transparency policies?

Leaps in information technology make possible a new generation of transparency policies. Technology can empower ordinary citizens to play an active role in shaping the content and format of the information they need. It also provides opportunities for people to pool their knowledge of auto defects, hospital mistakes, or disease outbreaks. However, technology alone cannot improve public transparency. Government action is still needed so that information is standardized and accurate. And disclosing companies and the users of information must be willing to play new roles. 

Back to Top